Monday, May 25, 2020

Describe the Measures that are Designed to Protect - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 299 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/10/10 Did you like this example? Question 13.8a Describe the measures that are designed to protect their security at work and the safety of those they support. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Describe the Measures that are Designed to Protect" essay for you Create order According to my understanding, the security of the workplace and those other whom I support at hospital premises is very crucial. Firstly, it is important to for the buildings to have the necessary security measures such as emergency doors and other evacuation equipment such as gas kits. Additionally, all the participants in the hospital should be aware of the places where these security devices located to use them when necessary. I should always ensure that all the outside doors remain closed to prevent unauthorized persons from the patients and the premises. I should aim at ensuring the safety of colleagues, and the patients in the hospital get protection Moreover, If suspect a patient with acute eye casualty; I should report the matter to the nurse in charge and the managers. Additionally, if I realize that my colleague is alone with a patient, I should use the switchboard 633335 that is placed at QMC to call the security. I should raise the concern so that the situation is known for any assistance needed. Apparently, I should move around with my colleagues in all the treatment rooms if I doubt their security while alone. During this period, I sit closer to a panic button to raise the alarm if security is needed. My awareness in the NUH is aggressive, violence and harassment. These are the policies required in the working environment. Additionally, I should ensure that after 8.30 pm there is a security button that the patients can press. I can, therefore, be in a position to check whom they are. The police office located on the QMC is beneficial. According to me, this is the procedure I would follow at NUH.

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Definition of the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification

A bona fide occupational qualification, also known as BFOQ, is a characteristic or attribute required for a job that could be considered discrimination if it were not necessary to perform the job in question, or if the job were unsafe for one category of people but not another. To determine if a policy in hiring or job assignment is discriminatory or legal, the policy is examined to ascertain whether the discrimination is necessary to the normal business operation and whether that category denied inclusion is uniquely unsafe. Exception to Discrimination Under Title VII, employers are not allowed to  discriminate  on the basis of sex,  race, religion,  or national origin. If religion, sex, or national origin can be shown to be necessary for the job, such as hiring Catholic professors to teach Catholic theology at a Catholic school, then a BFOQ exception can be made.  The BFOQ exception does not permit discrimination on the basis of race. The employer must prove that the BFOQ is reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the business or whether the BFOQ is for a unique safety reason. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) extended this concept of BFOQ to discrimination  based on age. Examples A restroom attendant can be hired taking into account sex because the users of the restroom have privacy rights.  In 1977, the Supreme Court upheld the policy in a male maximum security prison requiring guards to be male. A women’s clothing catalog could hire only female models to wear women’s clothes and the company would have a BFOQ defense for its sex discrimination. Being female would be a bona fide occupational qualification of the modeling job or an acting job for a specific role. However, hiring only men as managers or only women as teachers would not be a legal application of a BFOQ defense. Being a certain gender is not a BFOQ for the vast majority of jobs. Why Is This Concept Important? BFOQ is important to feminism and women’s equality. Feminists of the 1960s and other decades successfully challenged stereotypical ideas that limited women to certain professions. This often meant reexamining ideas about job requirements, which created more opportunities for women in the workplace. Johnson Controls Supreme Court decision:  International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) v. Johnson Controls, 886 F.2d 871 (7th Cir. 1989) In this case, Johnson Controls denied certain jobs to women but not to men, using the bona fide occupational qualification argument.  The jobs in question involved exposure to lead that could harm fetuses; women were routinely denied those jobs (whether pregnant or not). The appellate court ruled in favor of the company, finding that the plaintiffs had not offered an alternative that would protect a womans or a fetus health, and also that there was not evidenced that a fathers exposure to lead was a risk to the fetus. The Supreme Court held that, on the basis of the Pregnancy Discrimination in Employment Act of 1978 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the policy was discriminatory and that ensuring fetal safety was at the core of the employees job performance, not essential to be employed in the work of making batteries.  The Court found that it was up to the company to provide safety guidelines and inform about risk, and up to workers (parents) to determine risk and take action. Justice Scalia in a concurring opinion also raised the issue of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, protecting employees from being treated differently if pregnant. The case is considered a landmark for womens rights because otherwise so many industrial jobs could be denied to women where there is a risk to fetal health.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Jon Lovett A Screenwriter And Former Speechwriter For...

Jon Lovett is a screenwriter and former speechwriter for president Obama. Most recently he was serving as a producer of the award-winning HBO series The Newsroom, and is also the co-creator and head writer of 2012 sitcom 1600 Penn on NBC. In Lovett’s speech â€Å"The Culture of Shut Up† he believes that too many debates deteriorate into misplaced rage, or discouraging free speech. Lovett believes that all the chaos that comes with free speech is worth it, rather than letting a few voices speak for the millions of people in the United States. Through his use of precise examples and his accessible style, Lovett presents a clear and convincing argument in favor of letting Americans have free speech without the worry of what comes with it.†¦show more content†¦Although there is no punishment by the government due to the protection of the first amendment Lovett brings up the idea that â€Å"the personal, financial, and social costs of saying the unsayable are prohi bitively high†(Lovett 31-32), bringing up the point that if a controversial topic is brought up there are almost always negative consequences to come with the discussion. He uses himself as an example in the article saying that most of the time people do not care what he has to say, but because sometimes things he does say create controversy, that it holds him back in his writing or speeches. Lovett’s tone throughout the article is humorous yet serious at the same time, still being effective in getting his point across. He uses the story of â€Å"the village† to show the reader that the â€Å"three elders† speak for the community as a whole and that â€Å"those with close ties to the three elders, those who had donated money to their campaigns, and lobbied their village offices† (Lovett 28) got an influence in what was brought up at the â€Å"town meetings†. Lovett chose to make the tone of his article more humorous in order to get his point across because it seems to come off as a little less controversial when discussing certain things such as freedom of speech. The order in which Lovett presents his speech is very successful in stating his views on freedom of

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Kathleen Chalfant an angel with six faces Essay Example For Students

Kathleen Chalfant an angel with six faces Essay Many angels grace Angels in America, but only one has wings. This is by playwright Tony Kushners design. Forced to endure the purgatory of AIDS-related illnesses and the diseases horrific effects, his earthbound angels discover the freedom of imagination. By the end of Kushners two-part, six-act epic, mortals learn how to fly into terra incognita imaginatively. How does such a transformation happen? Ask cast member Kathleen Chalfant. Better still, ask one of the six characters she plays. An angel is just a belief, explains Hannah Pitt, a Mormon Mother Courage who abandons Utah comforts to search New Yorks mean streets for her gay but closeted lawyer son. A theory, with wings and arms, that can carry you. You have to be lifted by something. If what you believe lets you down, you have to seek for something new. Outline1 Good but not nice  2 Not an alien world  3 Wrestling with Roy Cohn   Good but not nice   Kathleen Chalfant has been giving voice to Hannahs account of angelic intervention since 1988. That was when director Oskar Eustis, who commissioned the play when he was literary manager at San Franciscos Eureka Theatre, cast her in a workshop of Millennium Approaches, the plays first half, mounted at the Mark Taper Forums experimental wing, Taper, Too. A phenomenon that resists logic both in its astonishing popularity and in its complex themes, Angels made its full-length American debut at the Los Angeles theatre this past allwhere, despite the sometimes obtuse mixture of metaphysics and religious symbolism in the plays second part, Perestroika, it broke every Taper box-office record. Now New York is breathlessly awaiting the next incarnation of Angels, due in April. Chalfant will be one of five in the eight-member Taper cast who will reprise their roles on the East Coast. Over the course of her five-year involvement with the play, she has learned much about Kushners mortal angels. Look at the people in this play theyre not nice, the 47-year-old New York actress said in her dressing room on the last weekend of the Taper run. Theyre not nice, she repeated, but theyre often good. Theyre good and theyre trying to find out what the truth is. And they fight through terribly difficult things, all of them. These good but not nice characters include Orthodox Rabbi Isidor Chemelwitz, a doctor, an aged Bolshevik, the ghost of Ethel Rosenberg and a heavenly spirit each one, as well as Hannah Pitt, manifested by Chalfant. But this is no double-casting, budget-cutting ploy. All but one of the three women and five men in the cast appear in the guise of other characters because Kushner wishes to emphasize theatrical illusion. Through imagination, Kushner insists, we are multitudes: old and young, male and female, straight and gay, flesh and spirit, human and angel. Not an alien world   To realize such ambitions, it helps a playwright to have an actress of Chalfants polymorphous talent. Shes the rock that Angels is really built upon, insists director Eustis. How does she embody such variety in a single evening? I cant say, because Im not exactly sure how I do it. Tony and I never worked on the roles together very much, but the skeletons of all these characters are so clearly there. The writing gives you a very firm basis for the characters. And then you sort of work in the details. Its like paintingsometimes things come. The subtitle of Angels in America is A Gay Fantasia on National Themes. How did Chalfant identify with the homosexual material? As far as I can tell, she ventures, Im straight. I certainly have husbands and children and all of that. But the gay world is not a world thats alien to me. Its a world I know. .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b , .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .postImageUrl , .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b , .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:hover , .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:visited , .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:active { border:0!important; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:active , .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud69c2ad16e46e7a4e081531f9395030b:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Jewel Walker: body talk EssayLike too many in the theatre world, Chalfant has seen up-close the ravages of AIDS. I have lost lots of friends, she said. And two of my friends were pioneers in this horrible adventure. The first died in 1982; the second, one of my dearest friends, died in 1983. For him, I was the day shift and his mother was the night shift at Roosevelt Hospital. In the play, when Hannahs son phones from a Central Park phone booth at 4 a.m. to confess that hes gay, Chalfants character bluntly responds: Youre old enough to understand your father didnt love you without being ridiculous about it. Despite such a cold comment, Chalfant insists that Hannah is not homophobic. She gets set up as the heavy mother, but by the time you get to Perestroika, shes changed. Yes, she has trouble in her relationship with her son. But shes not homophobic. Chalfant based her characterization of Hannah on a Mormon acquaintance, among other friends, female and male. Parts of her are my mother, she said, and parts of her are my mother-in-law, who is an extremely religious but intelligent person. She came to see the play and I was concerned she might be offended. But backstage all she said was, Cathy, Ive lived a lot longer than you have and seen lots of things. Anyway, Im not Pat Robertson. Wrestling with Roy Cohn   In portraying Ethel Rosenberg, Chalfant tried to avoid literally mirroring the victim of 1950s Communist witch-hunters Joe McCarthy and Roy Cohn. My Ethel isnt very much like the real Rosenberg, she said. Tony has written a character that is inspired by this person, but not necessarily the person herself. I read a lot about Ethel Rosenberg, because I was a kid when she was electrocuted. Even though I came from a family in which my mother was very liberal and my father was very conservative, and there was a lot of talk about politics, I never knew about the Rosenberg case specifically. The part of the male doctor, known simply as Henry, proved to be the most difficult of Chalfants multiple roles. The doctor is required to tell the volatile Roy Cohn that he has the AIDS virus, and comes suddenly face-to-face with total denial and career-threats. Roy Cohn is not a homosexual, Cohn responds, in a fury. Roy Cohn is a heterosexual manwho fucks around with guys. It was not until the second Taper run that Chalfant came to understand the doctors motivations why he speaks so bluntly to the dangerous Cohn. I finally realized that Henry thinks he has to convince Roy to pull all his stringsHenrys purpose is to motivate Roy to get his hands on this illegal drug. But all of a sudden he finds himself in a battle for his life. Its a perfect little scene. The play is so rich that you can do it for three years, and then all of a sudden have a fresh revelation. On that final weekend of the Tapers record-breaking Angels run, dressing rooms echoed with speculation about New Yorks theatrical bidding war. Who would get Angels? All the cast knew that the previously announced New York Shakespeare Festival run was unlikely, and that the Nederlanders, Shuberts and Jujamcyn organizations were dueling for the opportunity to bring the work to Broadway. (Jujamcyn prevailed, and Millennium Approaches is scheduled to open in April at the Walter Kerr Theatre under the direction of George C. Wolfe, with Perestroika to follow at a later date.) But none of the cast seemed surprised that an avant-garde, serious play about AIDS would trigger such intense interest. After all, they had watched audiences respond in spontaneous standing ovations. They had been lauded by critics. And they believed in this plays spiritual potential. .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 , .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .postImageUrl , .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 , .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:hover , .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:visited , .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:active { border:0!important; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:active , .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834 .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u5c6d65653869a13a282199c731e73834:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: William Finn EssayIts important politically that it be on Broadway, Chalfant observed. I think its a gift to the community for whom its written. It has the power to transform the way people think.